So apparently new RPM segfaults on some architectures randomly, I'm digging into it. In worst case, I'll tag old version and try to debug it locally. So far I can't reproduce it =( On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:36 PM Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.15, rpm 4.15-alpha > will be hitting rawhide soon. A soname bump is involved but Igor kindly > promised to handle rebuilding all dependent packages as part of the > change, so no further action required from others on that account. > > There are some other things that will require actions from others however: > > A pile of language-specific macros and scripts have been eliminated from > rpm upstream, notably %__python and %__perl and everything built around > them, such as %python_sitelib and %perl_sitelib and their relatives. > Python packages should be using the version specific macros already, > provided by respective pythonN-devel packages so this shouldn't be an > issue. On perl-side, those macros have been temporarily added to > redhat-rpm-config instead to avoid breaking things right now, later to > be moved to final destination in perl-macros or such. > > Another major change is in Python bindings where Python 3 is now > properly supported. In all the previous versions where Python 3 bindings > were buildable and available, string data from header was returned as > bytes, but the rest of the API expects strings so nothing really works > (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751). To make it > worse, it was incompatible with every single rpm-python script ever > written. Usually when something is unusably broken, silence means that > it's not being used, otherwise people do complain. Not so in this case, > the absurd API has been there for almost ten years and people have > adopted to it with zero complaints. In short, rpm-python users still > supporting both Python 2 and 3 are generally compatible with this > change, but Python 3-only projects have out of necessity adopted to the > broken API and will now need to change. The most critical distro > components have more or less already been adopted, but here's more work > to do on this front. This fixed interface will be made available to > 4.14.x somehow too, but the details are yet unclear. Because of that, > we'd suggest only patching packages in rawhide to work with the change > right now, and deal with upstreams once dust settles a bit. > > Other than that, a major new thing is introduction of some parallel > operations in rpmbuild itself. Testing hasn't shown anything odd but > with threads and all, you never know. Keep your eyes open. > > More info and details available in the preliminary release notes at > https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.15.0 and the change page linked at the > start of this message. > > - Panu - > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
