On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:41:39 -0400 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 9:33 AM Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:34:16 -0400 > > Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200 > > > > Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch > > > > > <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken > > > > > > dependencies, but it is not sent anymore. I last received > > > > > > such email on 11th of March 2018, so probably we don't > > > > > > really care ... > > > > > > > > > > The problem with that check is that it just checks if all > > > > > dependencies are provided by other packages, but it doesn't > > > > > check if they can be installed at the same time. So if I > > > > > would have package with Requires: foo + Conflicts: foo, that > > > > > check won't tell anything. > > > > > > > > > > Same applies to rich dependencies "with", it just checks if > > > > > one condition is provided by anything so this check is not > > > > > useful for packages with rich dependencies at all… > > > > > > > > IIRC the original problem was that repoclosure used yum > > > > underneath which didn't understand rich/weak deps at all. Do we > > > > still wait on a tool using dnf/libsolv to provide equivalent > > > > functionality as repoclosure? > > > > > > > > > > I already ported spam-o-matic to DNF, however the multi-arch stuff > > > > do you mean multi-lib, i.e. it would work still for non-multilib > > arches (eg. aarch64 or ppc64le)? > > > > No, I meant what I said. I mean multi-arch. That is, checking across > all architectures from an x86_64 host. I see, thanks, Dan > That said, aarch64 and ppc64le are multi-lib arches, we just don't > ship it in Fedora this way. > > For example, OpenMandriva is shipping armv7hnl + aarch64 multi-lib. We > just don't because we started earlier when most aarch64 systems > couldn't support 32-bit arm at all. > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
