Re: Stale packages in Fedora 30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 03. 06. 19 v 5:47 Samuel Sieb napsal(a):
> On 6/2/19 8:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Perhaps related, on an upgraded Fedora 30 system I see
>> ghostscript-fonts-5.50-37.fc27.noarch, which does not appear on any
>> clean installed systems, and also can't be installed (Error: Unable to
>> find a match ). That tells me it's been dropped or is obsolete, so is
>> it normal for such packages to persist through upgrades?
>
> Yes, normally there's nothing to cause it to be removed.  At some
> point you will probably get a conflict when a required library soname
> is bumped and then --allowerasing will remove it.


`dnf autoremove` could help as well.


Vít

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux