On Sun, Jun 2, 2019, 21:14 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31. 05. 19 16:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:19 PM Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
>> of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
>> successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
>> of these are incompletely retired or there's otherwise some good reason
>> for it, this is just to raise visibility.
>
> AFAICT, a lot of these packages should have been retired ages ago.
>
> Is the retirement procedure for long-standing FTBFS packages being done at all?
Not at all. See https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7718
Literally OOF'ed out loud when I read the comments on the ticket.
Thank you, Miro, for working on this.
Fabio
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
