So, most of my concerns have already been mentioned by other folks in this thread: * No rhel7/8 support will annoy people, and also increase burden on fedora infrastructure since we would have to move our koji hubs to Fedora instead of RHEL to be able to read the rpms made on builders. (Or ship a custom rpm, but we have done that before and it's been always a nightmare). * This cannot land until we finish sorting out armv7 builder issues. (see bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576593 ). I am trying to see if we can get away with a f29 userspace and a specific kernel we think works. Until this is moved however, all the armv7 buildvm's are on fedora 27, so they wouldn't be able to handle this change. * The drpm issue is somewhat minor in my mind since we don't produce very useful drpms right now (due to pungi not having anything more than the last updates compose to build them against). So, this definitely needs extra coordination if we decide to go for it. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
