Re: Replacing glibc langpacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 20:13, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[.,]
> > In other words your proposition is *not* about not any kind of
> > reduction size but increase size of installed resources because those
> > binary files which needs to be present will be increased by source of
> > those binary files. Other thing is that generating those files on
> > install-time elongates install time.
>
> 2.9 MiB (compiled en_US.utf8 locale) plus 3.4 MiB (compressed locale
> sources without charmaps) is 6.3 MiB, which is less than 6.7 MiB
> (current installed glibc-langpack-en size).

It should be possible to minimise this size by use proper %lang(en_US) tagging.
Only this and nothing more.
Nevertheless Fedora is not using rpm as it is designed .. shame but
that is only cause of what is seen as the issue in this context.

kloczek
-- 
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux