Do these compose reports need to spam devel@ ? I don't think most packagers are involved in composes, and it's hard to follow devel@ when it's so busy. It's already cross-posting to test@, that should be enough... perhaps there can be a composes@ list for these? Then folks can opt in. On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:44 PM Fedora compose checker <rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Missing expected images: > > Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 > Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > -- > Mail generated by check-compose: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
