On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello packagers, > > The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum > maintenance for the glassfish-jsp package, and none of our packages > depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it, > preferably someone who actively uses glassfish-jsp or maintains a > package that depends on it. > > For reference, the following packages have a direct dependency on > glassfish-jsp, either at build- or at install-time: > > - eclipse > - hadoop > - jspc > > > If you received this email directly, you're a (co-)maintainer of one > of these packages, and would probably be best qualified to take care > of glassfish-jsp. > > If you want to take glassfish-jsp off our hands, fill out the > "package_adoption_request" template here: > https://www.pagure.io/stewardship-sig/new_issue > > If nobody claims the package within the next two weeks, we will orphan > it again, setting it on its course towards retirement in about two > months. > > Thanks, > Fabio (decathorpe), for the Stewardship SIG It seems to me that the steady flow of orphaning happening by the Stewardship SIG is not much better than the previous mass orphaning, especially for casual packagers who depend on these. I understand the Stewardship SIG can't maintain these indefinitely, but I was kinda hoping for at least one or two Fedora releases... to have enough time to come to terms with the missing deps and to try to understand modularity. At the current rate, it seems we're still headed for mass orphaning and/or many one-package-each modules in the near future. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
