On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:26 AM Felix Schwarz <fschwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 19.05.19 um 17:23 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz: > > Based on your example, yes: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ > > > > "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the > > *binary* rpm." > > Thank you - somehow I missed that part. > > Felix Shouldn't that depend on the license? The source code is normally contained in the SRPM. Would it make sense to segregate that source code into a different package with a distinct license, if possible? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
