On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:33 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 01:30 -0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Then the guidelines should be changed to accomodate >> this. Wasnt flexible trademark guidelines one of the >> changes for the rename to Fedora? > >It would certainly be useful if the trademark guidelines permitted one >to build and distribute a DVD or set of CDs which contains _only_ >Fedora Core, Fedora Extras and the official updates to those. I think it might - but maybe we should get a clarification: http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/page4.html They must only use the Fedoraâ mark in association with the original Fedoraâ code found on the Fedora Project website (see http://fedora.redhat.com/) without modification Both extras and core are available here, and updates also. http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/page5.html So we'd be shipping unmodified Fedora Core, Updates and Extras as a work. Which is still identifiable as Fedora. So I don't think we fall into the "seperate patches" category. Paul
