Re: Package pruning for FC4 and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ons, 02.03.2005 kl. 19.40 skrev Demond James:
> Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> 
> >BTW, we must decide wether Fedora (core+extras(+livna)) should be
> >self-containing, or if it should be as easy as possible to use as a
> >platform for 3. party programs. I think it should be made as easy as
> >possible to use as a platform, and not depend on the "all programs MUST
> >come from RH/extras or they ar EVIL!" thinking we are seeing now...
> >
> >Kyrre
> >
> >  
> >
> Where are you seeing that?  You are seeing a discussion of Fedora
> Core/Extras development.  3rd party development discussions are
> elsewhere.  3rd party programs are welcomed.

No it's just the common mentality i am seeing on these lists - if a lib
isn't required for anything in core, drop it as fast as possible!


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux