On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:27 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25. 04. 19 9:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 24. 04. 19 v 23:04 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> >> Removed packages that would block the upgrades to Fedora 32 will be
> >> obsoleted from {{package|fedora-obsolete-packages}}.
> >
> > Which effectively means all python2-* packages. Right?
>
> Almost. The ones that stop requiring the automatic provides and get FESCo
> exception to use python27 won't be obsoleted.
>
> Note that only "problematic on upgrade" packages should be obsoleted, but
> anything that would require python(abi) = 2.7 or similar jumps to this category,
> so yes, probably all of them.
>
> (I've previously forgot to reply to the list.)
How much is going to be needed for "mock" to still work for older
operating systems? And for .spec files that may be backported to older
Fedora or EPEL, do we want to have "with_python2" as a designated
option to disable for Fedora > 31, but leave enabled for EPEL and
older Fedora? I realize it's work similar to that of using
"with_python3" up until now, but I'm not convinced we can gracefully
abandon that altogether.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
