On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[..]
> > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> >
> > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > $1}'|sort | uniq -c | sort -nr| head -n 20
> > 485 -Wmissing-profile
> > 106 -Wformat-security
> > 81 -Wmaybe-uninitialized
> > 44 -Wimplicit-fallthrough=
> > 24 -Wunused-function
> > 20 -Wpointer-sign
> > 20 -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> > 19 -Wstringop-truncation
> > 8 -Wformat-truncation=
> > 8 -Wcast-qual
> > 7 -Wcast-function-type
> > 4 -Wcpp
> > 4 -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch
> > 3 -Wparentheses
> > 2 -Wunused-value
> > 2 -Wunused-parameter
> > 2 -Wmissing-prototypes
> > 2 -Wmisleading-indentation
> > 2 -Wint-to-pointer-cast
> > 2 -Wdiscarded-qualifiers
> >
> > BTW: each Fedora package build should have as part of the build report
> > something like above.
> >
>
> Could you explain why it should? I am not sure what those flags
> actually mean and why it would tell me anything about a package build.
> If upstream decides that libX needs to be compiled with
> -Wmissing-prototypes but nothing else.. what is it to me?
That list is not in order of importance but how often some warning
happened, and I think that you are fully aware that on that list are
things far more important than missing prototype.
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
