Am Donnerstag, den 07.03.2019, 09:53 +0000 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:47:51AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:29:52AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:02:00AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Error: > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: package libvirt- > > > > daemon-kvm-5.1.0-1.fc30.x86_64 requires libvirt-daemon-driver- > > > > storage = 5.1.0-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be > > > > installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - package libguestfs- > > > > 1:1.40.2-2.fc30.x86_64 requires libvirt-daemon-kvm >= 0.10.2-3, > > > > but none of the providers can be installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - package libvirt-daemon- > > > > driver-storage-5.1.0-1.fc30.x86_64 requires libvirt-daemon- > > > > driver-storage-rbd = 5.1.0-1.fc30, but none of the providers can > > > > be installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - package libguestfs-devel- > > > > 1:1.40.2-2.fc30.x86_64 requires libguestfs.so.0()(64bit), but > > > > none of the providers can be installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - package libguestfs-devel- > > > > 1:1.40.2-2.fc30.x86_64 requires libguestfs(x86-64) = 1:1.40.2- > > > > 2.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - package libvirt-daemon- > > > > driver-storage-rbd-5.1.0-1.fc30.x86_64 requires > > > > librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > > > installed > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests > > > > DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides > > > > libcrc32.so()(64bit) needed by librados2-1:14.1.0-1.fc30.x86_64 > > > > > > > > (from > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/15/33260015/root.log > > > > ) > > > > > > > > This looks like it might be fixed by ceph-14.1.0-2.fc30. > > > > > > > > Do we just need to add a build override, or does this require a > > > > further fix in libvirt and/or ceph? > > > > > > To answer my own question - I added a 5 day build override and > > > that > > > seems to have fixed things. > > > > So I guess there was a ceph override already when we built it, and > > this > > this expired preventing installs until you re-added the override ? > > I'm not sure if the libvirt build would have been affected by this? > In any case the 5 day override fixes things for now. > > There is no Bodhi update for ceph however. I'm not sure if we need > one. Up til quite recently Bodhi was not required for F30, but I see > now updates appearing: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?releases=F30&status=pending Hi, the recent build of ceph was made after the bodhi activation point, so an update for it needs to be submitted. As we are in the beta freeze for now, you should also ask for a freeze exception. You should tag the buildroot override for ceph up until Apr 4th, to make sure it will be available during the hole possible time of the beta freeze. Björn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
