Dne 01. 03. 19 v 12:11 Diogo Galvao napsal(a): > Problem 4: package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64 > - exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > If that's the case, do I file the bug reports as Fedora 30 for whois > and darktable components, respectively? Is it enough to just mention > this output? This one is being addressed as part of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674787 Generally yes - you should file bugs for Fedora 30 release. Usually it is enough pasting the output and stating that you get this when trying to upgrade from F29 to F30. Miroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
