[root@ossus Survey2]# sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 522 kB/s | 2.4 MB 00:04 Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 99 B/s | 257 B 00:02 Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates 207 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 131 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 30 - x86_64 20 MB/s | 61 MB 00:03 RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free - Updates 52 kB/s | 71 kB 00:01 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates' RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free 194 kB/s | 71 kB 00:00 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free' RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree - Updates 194 kB/s | 71 kB 00:00 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates' RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree 193 kB/s | 71 kB 00:00 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree' Ignoring repositories: rpmfusion-free-updates, rpmfusion-free, rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, rpmfusion-nonfree Error: Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 Problem 2: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch Problem 3: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 Problem 4: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires whois-nls = 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29) >= 1, but none of the providers can be installed - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-repos-29-3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch Problem 6: package eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-5.fc30.x86_64 requires hamcrest, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-4.fc29.x86_64 - package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded Problem 7: package eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-6.fc30.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient-cache), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-5.fc29.noarch - package httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.6-3.fc30.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient) = 4.5.6, but none of the providers can be installed - httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.5-5.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-5.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package httpcomponents-client-4.5.6-3.fc30.noarch is excluded Problem 8: package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-3.fc30.noarch requires maven-resolver-transport-file, but none of the providers can be installed - package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-3.fc30.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.maven.resolver.transport.file), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-2.fc29.noarch - package maven-resolver-transport-file-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-spi) = 1.3.1, but none of the providers can be installed - maven-resolver-transport-file-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package maven-resolver-spi-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch is excluded Problem 9: problem with installed package maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch - package maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-util) = 1.3.1, but none of the providers can be installed - maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package maven-resolver-util-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch is excluded Problem 10: problem with installed package hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch - package hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 1.3-24.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed - package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - hamcrest-core-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded Problem 11: problem with installed package system-config-firewall-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch - package system-config-firewall-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch requires python2-slip-dbus >= 0.2.7, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-slip-dbus-0.6.4-12.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On 2/28/19 11:05 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 02. 19 16:55, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 07:51 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 06:46 -0800, Tom London wrote: >>>> [root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf --releasever=30 >>>> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing >>>> distro-sync >>>> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 536 kB/s | 2.4 MB >>>> 00:04 >>>> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 71 B/s | 257 B >>>> 00:03 >>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates 67 B/s | 257 B >>>> 00:03 >>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 62 B/s | 257 B >>>> 00:04 >>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 7.4 MB/s | 61 MB >>>> 00:08 >>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 3.2 kB/s | 6.9 kB >>>> 00:02 >>>> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox' >>>> Ignoring repositories: virtualbox >>>> Error: >>>> Problem 1: package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 requires >>>> libblockdev(x86-64) = 2.21-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be >>>> installed >>>> - libblockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade >>>> repository >>>> - problem with installed package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 >>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33105158 ought to >>> fix this. >> >> More generally, the *flood* of Python 2 dep issues here is something I >> was definitely concerned about with the Python 2 retirement policy >> explicitly deciding not to say anything about obsoleting Python 2 >> subpackages :( > > I wanted the py3 packages to obsolte the py2, but i was outvoted. > > I now manually add those to fedora-obsoelte-packages, but I do it in > batches. > I wait for a compose now to make another batch (fora rawhide and f30). > -- -- www.diehlpk.de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
