On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:39 AM Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/02/27 2:29:
> Richard Shaw wrote on 2019/02/27 2:23:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:17 AM Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So... I guess Qt "foreach" behavior changed with gcc9..
>>>
>>
>> Is there any chance this will change or magically get fixed if qt is
>> rebuilt with gcc 9?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>>
>
> Well, foreach or Q_FOREACH is just a "#define" macro (from /usr/include/Qt/qglobal.h and
> /usr/include/QtCore/qglobal.h), so rebuilding qt(4) itself does not sense.
>
So now I tried to change all "foreach(... , ...)" usage with "for(... : ...)",
actually it seems okay??
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33067948
What I did is:
LANG=C grep -rl 'foreach.*,' . | \
xargs sed -i -e '\@foreach.*,@s|foreach\(.*\),|for\1:|'
So now I appreciate it if someone would investigate Q_FOREACH macro.
Thanks Mamoru! As far as you know is this safe to put in an official build?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
