On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 02:29:32AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote on 2019/02/27 2:23: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:17 AM Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > So... I guess Qt "foreach" behavior changed with gcc9.. > > > > > > > Is there any chance this will change or magically get fixed if qt is > > rebuilt with gcc 9? > > > > Thanks, > > Richard > > > > Well, foreach or Q_FOREACH is just a "#define" macro (from /usr/include/Qt/qglobal.h and > /usr/include/QtCore/qglobal.h), so rebuilding qt(4) itself does not sense. The Q_FOREACH macro relied on a G++ bug, which got fixed (in particular, g++ rejects forever break; and continue; in statement expressions outside of a loop body (condition, init expr, increment expr) if there is no outer loop, but due to a bug if it got past this check, for C++ would jump to the break/continue labels of the inner rather than outer loop; for C we got it right, and for GCC 9 finally fixed it. You need the https://github.com/qt/qtbase/commit/c35a3f519007af44c3b364b9af86f6a336f6411b fix, which should be in reasonably recent Qt, but if some packages use very old headers, the patch needs to be applied... Note, clang/clang++ for some weird reason chose the non-sensical behavior. Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
