On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:16:56PM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Samstag, den 16.02.2019, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 10:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f30-failures.html > > > now says "21 failed builds". I assume that nobody fixed the other > > > 1k+ > > > failures during the night and this result is bogus. > > > > I think besser82 ran a rebuild loop over all failed packages to weed > > out the ones that failed only due to koji or networking issues. > > It looks like that removed all rebuilt packages from the list, whether > > or not they succeeded to build. > > > > Fabio > > > Yes, for some unknown reason the packages are removed from the mentioned > page as soon as someone starts a build for them. Maybe this should be > fixed somehow. > > Anyways, the need-rebuild page [1] still shows them as failed. Interesting. I see the following contents: ausil (5): Fedora-Cloud-Atomic Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-Vagrant Fedora-Cloud-Base Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant Fedora-Docker-Base <--------- not packages dchen (1): enunciate (Re-review: enunciate-core-annotations) <--------- not something one can build jchaloup (1): Review Request: golang-github-garyburd-redigo <--------- likewise martinkg (1): andy-super-great-park mohanboddu (3): Fedora-AtomicHost Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant orion (1): python3-doctutils releng (1455): <---------- poor releng :) 0install ... Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
