Re: python-cherrypy vs python3-cherrypy - can we keep just one?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:24:51PM +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 14.02.19 um 23:15 schrieb Ken Dreyer:
> > In that case, we can retire python3-cherrypy and move all development
> > to python-cherrypy, right?
> 
> We could, sure. But why bother?
> I don't have strong feelings about either solution but I don't really see the
> point. (We will have more and more "python3-" package names in the future when
> new libraries are packaged.)

With that, I'm looking for co-maintainers for python-cherrypy. The
package is severely outdated and it seems there hasn't been any
significant contribution to this over the past 4 years. I may have been
too optimistic with my available time for this.

Any interests?

Matthias
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux