On Thursday, 14 February 2019 at 11:11, Dave Love wrote: > [Re-sending from a subscribed address, apologies for any duplicates.] > > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Why not 4.0.0? It was released in September 2018 and it's supposedly ABI > > compatible with 3.x: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00119.html > > I guess you haven't tried it :-/. Indeed, I haven't. > It may be ABI compatible, but it's > not API compatible (at least by default); that's apart from the usual > sort of breakage you expect from a major version. I've wasted too much > time on it, and given up locally for now. Understood. I guess the way forward is to update to latest 3.1.x now and start working on 4.0.0 after F30 is branched in COPR. I might be able to lend a hand or two. ;) > I wish there was an MPI one could be happy with, providing the > flexibility of OMPI without the maintenance issues. Seconded. For example, there are subtle differences between MPICH and OpenMPI regarding MPI_OFFSET_KIND int type on 32bit arches and neither upstream considered changing to be consistent with the other: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/4846 https://github.com/pmodels/mpich/issues/3002 I'm sure there are other pitfalls as well. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
