Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ron Yorston [13/02/2019 08:45] :
>
> What causes a package to move?  I guess it doesn't just happen
> spontaneously, so presumably it's a choice the maintainer makes.

It isn't really a move per se. A regular package can be copied into
a module.  If the package is then orphaned/retired, it ceases to be
a regular package but stays part of a module.

> If so, why would they do that?  Why would they *not* want their package
> to be available as a regular package?  It seems counterproductive for
> them to downgrade their package to this second-class status.

The goal, IIUC (and I'm not at sure that I do), is to for each module to be
able to have its own lifecycle, seperate from the lifecycle of the
distribution.

Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux