‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:42 PM, jt <jtfas90@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am looking at the FTBFS for hyperscan[0] and need some assistance. > From what I can tell it looks like this may be related to the --as- > needed linker change. > > The reason I say it may be related to the linking change is I can build > the 5.1.0 release against the fedora-29-x86_64 mock profile and the > CMakeOutput.log from a local mock build against the fedora-rawhide- > x86_64 profile[1] seems to indicate a linking issue. > > This is outside my expertise but I would obviously like to fix the > issue the most appropriate way possible. > > So if this is linker issue, what's the best approach to fix in this > case? > > If it isn't a linker issue, where should I start poking next? > > Thanks in advance for any pointers. > > [0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32400415 > [1] https://gist.github.com/jmtaylor90/bd9680de68d1f8486dacd4e0b645f07b > > JT > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I've hit this as well on other pacakges.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
