Re: Retire apiextractor?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 12.02.19 um 02:35 schrieb Richard Shaw:
> Currently apiextractor is FTBFS[1] because all the test fail.
> 
> It looking to see if there is a newer version that better supports gcc 9.0.x I
> found this[2] which states that apiextrator was merged into shiboken.
> 
> So can someone with more familiarity with pyside/shiboken/apiextractor say if
> apiextracor should be retired?

Just to add: If someone wants to help out with shiboken/pyside(1) this would
be appreciated too. I'll try to get the FTBFS sorted out but I have a lot to
do right now.

Longer term getting pyside2 in Fedora would be better as upstream stopped
maintaining pyside 1 (but that version is the only one supporting Python
2.7/QT4). pyside2 uses a newer version of shiboken (which can not be used for
pyside1 iirc).

Felix
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux