* Marcel Plch: > Hello, Florian, > > I don't see any problem in this. > Even if an extension function receives a pointer to a local variable, > it should be fine as long as the variable is up the stack. Should it be > downwards, it is undefined behavior anyways, linked or not. > Maybe I have just misunderstood, can you please come up with a specific > scenario, even better an example, where the problem occurs? If you take the address of a local variable and pass the resulting pointer to another function, the compiler will generate a call to __stack_chk_fail, which lives in glibc. At build time, linking against glibc is required so that this symbol receives its proper version, otherwise the resulting binary is invalid and may not be compatible with future glibc versions. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
