Re: signing status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/9/19 4:48 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 08.02.2019, 08:41 -0800 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>> Just wanted to update everyone on our current status.
>>
>> As you know from the other thread:
>>
>> * The mass rebuild happened and finished.
>> * The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag
>> (to make sure everything was signed).
>> * In the middle of the night our autosign box stopped processing.
>> * The next morning this was noticed and a request for a replacement
>> motherboard was sent.
>> * Since that was going to take a day, we setup another machine to do
>> autosigning.
>> * That machine started processing the backlog, but also stopped
>> processing a few times (waiting on koji).
>> * Finally we set back up the normal listening process and I retagged
>> all
>> the f30-pending builds to it would "see" they needed processing.
>>
>> Currently it's processing along pretty fast, but it does make sure
>> koji
>> has the signed rpms written out, which can take a few seconds on
>> larger
>> packages.
>>
>> I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back to
>> normal.
>>
>> There will likely be a short outage next week to move back to the now
>> replaced hardware, but that should be only a few minutes.
>>
>> kevin
> 
> 
> Thank you for the extra work, Kevin and all other being involved with
> it!
> 
> 
> Just asking as this came to my mind from a different thread:
> 
>>> Looks like that it was only the mass rebuild packages that got stuck
> in
>>> the signing queue and other builds were processed normally (they
> moved
>>> from f30-pending to f30), so they are going to be out of order when
> the
>>> mass rebuild signing/tagging into f30 finishes.
>>>
>>> Is there any chance releng could figure out the list of packages
>>> affected once the signing/tagging is finished and fix all of them? I
> can
>>> already tell that it's affecting at least 40-50 GNOME builds done in
>>> that time frame.
> 
>> Yes, there's a releng script to fix this very case... can run after
>> everything is finished signing/tagging.
> 
> 
> Has that issue been adressed already, too?

Yes, I already fixed all those.

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux