On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:01:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > But wait also: can't the module just refer to the release-branch (base) > > dist-git? Why maintain two copies? > Well, they can. But someone needs to build it twice: once using fedpkg > build and once using fedpkg module-build from the different repo > (which always requires at least empty commit). That's kind of annoying. Can we use Freshmaker or similar to auto-build the module? > > [2] hey, what happened to sgallagh's "hybrid" proposal where output from > > modules could just be *tagged into* base? That seemed perfect for cases > > like this. > Well, it is called UM which is stuck in the FESCo loop. That seems significantly more complicated to me. Ursa Major is about adding modules to the buildroot; the "hybrid" idea was that the modular package builds could also be tagged as "regular" builds and land in the non-modular repo. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
