On Sun, 2019-01-27 at 21:52 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:49 PM Siteshwar Vashisht <svashisht@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2019 11:06:39 PM > > > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0 > > > > > > It's also only been released for barely 2 weeks, it's marked as a > > > major revision number, and it seems a bit late to accept for Fedora > > > 30. Mark it as a candidate for Fedora 31, and move on? > > > > I am fine with doing that. But we are missing a chance to get some early testing on the latest release. > > > > Is there some way we can (ab)use Koschei to see how things would look > for bash 5.0 in Rawhide? Personally, I really don't think we'd have as > many problems as people fear, but if there's a way we could do > something interesting to prove it, that'd be great too. Koschei only builds things, so that would only catch issues in bash scripts used at build time (and only ones that caused a package build failure, at that). It would not catch any issues that didn't cause a package build failure, or any runtime issues in the vast swathes of bash that are used at runtime. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
