On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 12:58 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Am 21.01.19 um 09:11 schrieb Ian Kent: > > As much as I would like to help I need to get an additional SSD > > for my NUC8i7HNK (Radeon™ RX Vega M GL graphics) for that (I hope > > fairly soon). > > > > And I think the Vega needs a later version of ROCm as well. > > Yes, AFAIK Vega M is not (yet?) supported by amdkfd. Also ROCm is mostly > developed/tested for more powerful hardware so I would not hold my breath for > Vega M support. Of course, yes, but I live in hope and I'd like to get familiar with ROCm! > > Anyway I'm happy to test packages with my Polaris card but I have to admit I > don't feel "knowledgeable" enough to review a more complex package like "hcc". > Probably it would help just doing the normal review process (except actually > running the binary). Either way it's hard to properly test something like this. I think the focus needs to be primarily on packaging so that we can help upstream along by simply making it available. That obviously implies developing a relationship with upstream which is often lacking in distributions with many packages (for obvious reasons). Ian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
