On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM John Harris <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:14:32 AM EST Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Note: Adding the Signed-off-by: line to a patch should be a conscious > > act and means that you certify you have the rights to submit this work > > under the same open source license. > > I'd argue that changing your project-specific .gitconfig to sign-off any > commits is definitely a conscious act. Regardless, proprietary projects would > have just as much of a reason to have their developers sign-off their commits, > unless they solve the issue through a strong CLA or other contract with all > developers contributing. This is not specific to 'open source' or free > software projects. I was quoting from the git manpage. I didn't choose those words. Take it up with git upstream :-) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
