On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 07:51:34PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Side note, I was at a loss of what you were getting at. There were several > > ways it could be interpreted and has been used by people in the past to > > mean different things. > > I think John's statement was pretty clear: The artificial distinction > between "Editions" and "Spins" needs to go away. > > > The problem is that there is an inherent conflict of resources here. When > > we put everything on the download pages, everyone including the spin > > owners say it was too confusing. The issue of which spins/editions are promoted is orthogonal to the issue of counting. After all, counting just reflects the actual frequency of installations, not the reasons for it. But counting may provide a fresh look at this issue. We'll have much better data which spins/editions are used. If it turns out that KDE is more popular than previous statistics showed, or that KDE has a higher retention rate (the number of short-lived installations is low suggesting that users "like it if they see it"), this would be a strong argument to make the KDE spin more visible. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
