On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100 > "J. Scheurich" <mufti11@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, > > > > What can be improvided ? > > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures, > > all tips of > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481 > > > > has been followed. > > well, I can't even see the spec file, the Spec URL: points to a web > site, not to the spec file :-( There is a reason why the review > template has this entry. ah, there is a second review where it has been fixed Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
