On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Artur Iwicki <suve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Just checked myself, I don't have the file either, and I use a separate local account for RPM packaging (that uses a different name than my FAS login). No idea what that's about, I can't recall any tool ever complaining about the file missing. For example, ~/.fedora.upn is used by fedpkg as the "authoritative" source of the FAS username. But, if that file isn't present, it just silently falls back to checking kerberos for the username, and if that doesn't work, it uses $USER. (See: the Command.*user* methods in __init__.py of both rpkg and fedpkg) Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
