Re: Periods in compat package names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:07 +0000, jdunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the 
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section 
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name) 
> seems to contradict the "Separators" section (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Separators)
> 
> The example describes naming a package as python-sqlalchemy0.5 to show how 
> to make a compatibility package, but the separators section says:
> > The maintainer MUST NOT use an underscore '_', a plus '+', or a period '.' 
> > as a delimiter.
> 
> Is the period inside the appended version number not considered a delimiter for these purposes?

The Separators section says explicitly:

"Version numbers used in compat libraries do not need to omit the dot
'.' or change it into a dash"

Therefore, this is an exception and not a contradiction.

-- 
Yaakov Selkowitz
Senior Software Engineer - Platform Enablement
Red Hat, Inc.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux