Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Eric Warnke wrote: >> ElectricFence - Development only nothing depends on it - 1 objection, >> but I still say it's usage does not justify it remaining in core - there >> is at least one competing package ( dmalloc, valgrind ) > > valgrind is i386 only (therefore not a replacement for efence) and > dmalloc is far worse then efence. If anything needs to be dumped to > Extras, then it is dmalloc, not ElectricFence. Yes yes yes and yes.
