On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 12:17 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote: >No, nano replaced pico. cone (in Extras) is intended to replace pine. >I don't think nano should be removed from Core. In fact, when cone is >ready, I think it should be brought into Core. Nano could really do with UTF-8 support. I'm very tempted to ship a CVS snapshot for that reason, although that's generally not a good thing to do. Cone still lacks the capability to get at IMAP servers by rsh/ssh, doesn't it? -- dwmw2
