Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed to gpg1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

> On Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 08:15, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 12/19/18 4:31 PM, John Harris wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:10:21 AM EST Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > > gnupg2 is now obsoleting gnupg and the previous gpg command is not
>> > > available.
> [...]
>> > I can't believe this was done without using the alternatives system!
>> 
>> Alternatives is not a solution, it's trouble looking for opportunities to
>> make more.
>> 
>> There are a handful of cases where it is appropriate, but using
>> alternatives means retaining support for all of the variants throughout
>> the distro. That's pretty much the opposite direction from obsoleting,
>> which is the purpose here.
> 
> Moreover, gpg2 is not option-compatible with gpg1, so using alternatives
> is not a good idea for this reason, either.

The same argument could be used to support not changing what 'gpg' points to 
(gpg v1 vs v2) as well.

-- Rex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux