Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed to gpg1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:15:44 AM EST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> That's pretty much the opposite direction from obsoleting,  which is the
> purpose here.

GnuPG 1 isn't obsolete. It may not be option compatible, but neither are 
different alternatives for `emacs`, `java`, `iptables`, `mkisofs` and so on. 
Just as the rest, there are a few options which are the same.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr. <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Splentity
https://splentity.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux