On Tuesday, 18 December 2018 at 11:29, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 18. 12. 18 11:22, Dave Love wrote: > > > loveshack: makedepf90 > > > > I don't think that's the case now. dl_poly used it, but I've removed > > the dependency and I wonder why it's showing up with a threat (I assume) > > to remove dl_poly. > > Indeed: > > Depending on: makedepf90 (1), status change: 2017-10-06 (62 weeks ago) > dl_poly (maintained by: loveshack) > dl_poly-1.10-1.fc30.src requires makedepf90 = 2.8.8-15.fc29 > > > That is because https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dl_poly/c/b39e9ea3ac097d85e6574c1167088c8c3d68031b?branch=master > was never built and the metadata are taken from the repos. For a bit of history behind makedepf90, it was a bundled build depencency for cp2k for a couple of releases, but they switched to another implementation, so it was no longer required. Also, makedepf90 upstream is not active as far as I remember. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
