Re: RFC: make fedora-release archful and add some provides

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/18 12:33 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hello folks,

for long time we have problem if you have some arch-specific
BuildRequires, you still get one src.rpm from one of arches (not sure
how koji chooses that one) which might not work for your architecture.

For example if you have following in spec:
%ifarch %{ldc_arches}
BuildRequires: ldc
%endif

And the src.rpm is taken by koji from x86_64 (included in
%{ldc_arches}), then you won't be able to run `dnf builddep foo`,
because it will complain that ldc package is missing.

If the problem is just `dnf builddep foo`, perhaps dnf could extract the spec file from the src.rpm and evaluate that? Or are other things being impacted?


--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux