On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 09:10 +0000, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 12/13/18 3:36 PM, Randy Barlow ha scritto: > > * Remove critpath karma[5]. > > > I know Fedora wants to move to a more community driven process, but > I > think the ideas behind adamw proposal [1] of the critpath field are > still valid. I'm not opposed to keeping critical path karma if it's believed to be useful. > I think we could make regular users post regular karma only and > provenpackagers/proventesters post critpath karma only (or whatever > we > decide to name it). The karma of an update would be calculated by > the > sum of karma + critpath karma, BUT if a negative critpath karma > exists, > the autopush feature would be disabled (for example, 4 regular users > give +1 and a proventester gives -1, the overall karma would be +3 > and > the threshold for autopush is reached, but the update is not pushed > because of proventester feedback). I don't believe we have proven testers anymore, do we? We already disable autopush on any negative karma today - I don't believe we should require a proven packager/tester's negative karma to disable autopusing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
