Re: afflib (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30. 11. 18 14:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/

lzma is dead upstream.

afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.

It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma.  But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).

However since neither of those happened we're stuck.  What is the
resolution for this?

Open a bugzilla?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux