On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 16:01 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > "NOOOOO" -adamw =) More seriously, to me this is kinda a natural consequence of what we've already talked about quite a bit with associating inputs and outputs. But I dunno if I'd think of it as *caching*, exactly, just more along the lines of 'only generate outputs when the relevant inputs change'. But, I mean, it's fine to think of it as caching too, I guess, it just hadn't occurred to me to look at it that way. Like all caching, it's fine so long as the implementation is correct, and a giant PITA when it isn't :P -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
