Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Richard W. M. Jones:

> Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276).
>
> We're down a rabbit hole where it seems that in Fedora 29
> /etc/nssswitch.conf ought to be a symlink.  This machine has been
> upgraded from F28 and this is not the case.  AFAIK I have never edited
> the file.

/etc/nsswitch.conf is owned by glibc.  It is not a symbolic link as we
ship it.

If find out which packages replaces our configuration with a symbolic
link, please file a bug against that package.  If they want to take over
/etc/nsswitch.conf, this is negotiable, but it needs coordination with
the glibc package.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux