Re: Fedora Upgrade - release criteria update proposal

[Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:43 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you follow exactly this procedure, the set of "the multilib packages 
installed before" will be empty and you will not reproduce the issue at 
hand. Multilib cruft has not been installed by default for years now! (And 
that is a good thing! Pure 64-bit just works.)

Yeah, of course, the "Verify that upgrade and update went fine and that the multilib packages installed before are still present" should have been in the later paragraph.

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:06 AM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I don't think the bug had anything to do with upgrades, did it? AIUI it
would also affect a fresh F29 install to which multilib packages had
been added.

I've got an impression from all the rant around that on the internet that it happened just on upgraded systems. But it makes sense to also affect clean installs.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx