>>>>> "NG" == Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> writes: NG> Most of these fonts look like they are licensed appropriately, the NG> only problem is the Ubuntu fonts, which have been noted to have a NG> non-free license[3] (unless someone can get Canonical to fix it). I had a look at the license at https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/font-licence and didn't see anything that strikes me as particularly non-free. The license has a forced renaming requirement for "Modified Versions which are Substantially Changed", but that kind of thing hasn't rendered something non-free in the past. The only thing which I've not seen before is a forced renaming requirement which specifies the name to be used: 3. Modified Versions which are not Substantially Changed must be renamed to both 1. retain the name of the Original Version and 2. add additional naming elements to distinguish the Modified Version from the Original Version. The name of such Modified Versions must be the name of the Original Version, with "derivative X" where X represents the name of the new work, appended to that name. So maybe that's an issue. The font doesn't appear in our list of licenses (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Font_Licenses) so I guess it wouldn't hurt to ping the legal list, which I'll do now. - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
