[Modularity] Working Group IRC meeting minutes (2018-11-13)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



=================================================================
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group
=================================================================


Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-11-13/modularity_wg.2018-11-13-15.04.html
Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-11-13/modularity_wg.2018-11-13-15.04.txt
Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-11-13/modularity_wg.2018-11-13-15.04.log.html


Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call  (nils, 15:04:39)

* Agenda  (nils, 15:05:33)
  * [asamalik] Module lifecycles  (nils, 15:06:14)
  * [asamalik] Stream default changes & Fedora Changes  (nils, 15:06:27)
  * [asamalik] Stream branch ownership for packages & modules  (nils,
    15:06:50)
  * [ignatenkobrain/sgallagh] How do we keep rawhide sane? (re: forcing
    people to latest modules)  (nils, 15:07:33)

* Module lifecycles  (nils, 15:08:17)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/112   (asamalik, 15:08:35)
  * This is a follow-up of a recent (well, a month ago?) threads on the
    Devel list about how we define and manage module lifecycles,
    containing a proposal and input from those threads in it  (asamalik,
    15:10:02)

* Stream default changes & Fedora Changes  (nils, 15:14:48)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/114   (nils, 15:15:40)
  * Likely the least complex topic of the four we have today. I have a
    very short proposal there, already two +1's from bcotton and
    sgallagh  (asamalik, 15:16:11)
  * we'll give it more time for people to give their +1's and -1's on
    this one  (asamalik, 15:25:14)

* Stream branch ownership for packages & modules  (nils, 15:25:54)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/115   (nils, 15:26:03)
  * A specific proposal regarding stream branch ownership. Already
    includes some input from recent (a month ago?) discussion about
    managing module lifecycles on the Devel list.  (asamalik, 15:26:59)

* How do we keep rawhide sane? (re: forcing people to latest modules)
  (reprise)  (nils, 15:44:15)
  * LINK: https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/108   (nils, 15:44:37)
  * we'll continue the discussion in the ticket  (asamalik, 15:51:35)

Meeting ended at 15:54:52 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* asamalik (73)
* nils (44)
* zodbot (19)
* langdon (18)
* contyk (12)
* sgallagh (6)
* ignatenkobrain (2)
* bcotton (2)
* mikedep333 (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-- 
Nils Philippsen    "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Software Engineer   purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither
Red Hat             Liberty nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:    C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux