On 08/11/2018 14:00, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 11. 18 v 13:04 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
On 08/11/2018 11:44, Daiki Ueno wrote:
The question is, is there any documented procedure to do this kind of
package merge safely? I guess at least the unnecessary packages
(nss-util and nss-softokn) would need to be retired.
Just follow the normal procedures for replacing packages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
So have the new merged nss obsolete the old versions of
nss-util and nss-softokn and then retire them.
I don't see any reason why the old versions should be explicitly
obsoleted, if the nss package is going to provide precisely the same
packages set. Just retiring should be fine IMO.
Oh sorry I misread the message and thought the goal was to produce
one binary rpm.
If it's going to one source rpm producing the same three binary
rpms then you are indeed correct.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
