On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 25/10/2018 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote: >> > The Fedora 29 Final RC1.2 compose [1] is GO and will to be shipped >> > live on Tuesday, October 30, 2018. >> > >> > For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3]. >> > >> > Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release. >> > >> > [1] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/ >> > [2] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-25/f29-final-go_no_go-meeting.2018-10-25-17.03.html >> > [3] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-25/f29-final-go_no_go-meeting.2018-10-25-17.03.log.html >> > >> >> Is there any reason why >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30445005 has been >> canceled? I don't see any obvious reason in the logs and I really want >> the Astronomy Spin to be shipped… Normally that spin builds fine, see >> latest daily build: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30453015 >> >> In addition I want to note that we have many broken spins like the >> Python Classroom and Design. I'm not sure whether it is a good idea to >> ignore this, also for marketing reasons :( > > Yes, I agree, I am at a loss as to why it was signed off as well, > there was blockers like "Be able to apply updates using the desktop > mechanism" that were seemingly ignored with broken gnome-software, > plus numerous other issues. I don't feel it was ready but clearly > someone had some agenda to ram it on through despite the issues. I read the minutes and my take away is almost 180 degrees from your conclusion. The process was rational and logical, and reached a reasonable conclusion objectively. There were valid subjective reasons to postpone. There was a gnome-software bug proposed as a blocker. It was determined not to be a blocker. So it's not correct to say it was a blocker and that it was ignored. And that there were numerous other issues (?) that were also not blockers, isn't something I can parse. On what process basis, including release criteria, whether existing now or one you'd like to propose, should this release have been held up? Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
