Ah, okay. Thanks.
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 11:33, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:11 AM Silvia Sánchez <bhkohane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello all,This didn't happen to me with the last version (F28) but I didn't install Workstation, I installed KDE Spin. So now my question is: Does this affect to all Fedoras, including Spins and Labs, or is it an issue that for some reason affects Workstation only?Kind regards.SilviaFAS: LailahIt affects anyone who has installed the fedora-workstation-repos package, which is installed by default only on Fedora Workstation (as it really doesn’t do anything useful except in the context of GNOME Software)._______________________________________________On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 21:01, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:06 PM Till Hofmann <thofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/25/18 4:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > It was discovered[1] a short while ago that, due to a packaging
> > mistake in the fedora-workstation-repos package, upgrades from Fedora
> > 28->Fedora 29 would replace the /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files provided
> > from that package with their default configuration.
> >
> > What this meant in practice is that anyone who was using those
> > repositories in Fedora 28 would find them silently disabled in Fedora
> > 29. In particular, this would mean that they might not notice that
> > they were not receiving updates, particularly (in the case of Chrome)
> > security updates.
> >
> > This has been fixed for F29 Final, but if you have upgraded from
> > F28->F29 prior to today (such as at the Beta release), you should
> > check and verify that your expected repos are correctly enabled.
> >
>
> Is it possible that this also happened on F28? I haven't upgraded to F29
> yet, but surprisingly my google-chrome repo is disabled and I'm using
> Chrome 68.0.3440.84 from 2 months ago. I'm pretty sure I never disabled
> the repo manually.
>
If there was a post-release update to the fedora-workstation-repos
package in F28, it's entirely possible, yes. It would have had the
same issue.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
